User talk:Aj631314

July 2024

Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at User talk:Discospinster. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 18:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Dude, you've done the exact same thing. Someone had a question asking if you were a bot and you just straight up deleted their comment(doesn't matter if it's your talk page, it's their question). Thank you. Aj631314 (talk) 02:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Discospinster isn't a "dude," and if you keep on calling people "crybabies" on Wikipedia, you'll be blocked. Take the sports fanboy talk to an Internet messageboard where it's tolerated. Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Who asked you? Aj631314 (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm an administrator, like Discospinster, and nobody needs to ask me. Acroterion (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if you're an administrator, nobody asked you. Aj631314 (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Just because you're an administrator doesn't mean you are above anybody else in Wikipedia. If nobody asked you, then don't say anything. Aj631314 (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you look at the guidelines as linked above, you will note that trolling and vandalism are acceptable reasons to remove someone's comments on your own talk page. ... discospinster _talk 15:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm looking at the guildines and I'm honestly not finding anything about that. Aj631314 (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

WP:UOWN. That doesn't mean that you may ignore administrators or prevent them from communicating with you about your conduct. Acroterion (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Right, but there's not a rule against it. And if you'll check, it's still there. Aj631314 (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

And again, nobody asked you. Aj631314 (talk) 02:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 03:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Really??? I left what discospinster put there. It's still there and I don't plan on removing it. Aj631314 (talk) 03:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Why feel the need for a ban? Aj631314 (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aj631314 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't deleted what he put on his talk page recently and don't plan to in the near future. And if you think what I said in this talk page was disruptive, keep in mind this is my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aj61314 (talk • contribs) 5:10 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Doug Weller talk 14:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you extend the block to 2 weeks? If what I'm doing is "personal attacks" and "harrasment", shouldn't what they're(Discospinster and Acroterion) doing be considered the same thing too? (Good luck fighting Cancer Btw) Aj631314

(talk page stalker) I have removed the unnecessary HTML code on this unblock request to allow administration to see this user's request. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate that, thank you. Sincerely, Aj631314

Acroterion(Currently blocked so I have to put my response here)

Wow, Acroterion, you're so observant! 🙄 I have another question for you. Why were you even on my talk page on the first place? Are you a friend of discospinster? If not, that's a little weird. If you think that comment is aggressive, well, welcome to the real world, "Wiki janitor". Aj631314 (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Because administrators watch each others' talkpages, since we tend to attract abusive comments. Your conduct is Exhibit A. You're indefinitely blocked now because it's obvious that you're just here to be obnoxious. Acroterion (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm not here to be obnoxious. I have made countless edits beforehand. I am simply trying to call you out for abusing your power as an administrator, which you are doing. Aj631314 (talk) 04:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm here to build an encyclopedia. Aj631314 (talk) 04:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Can we get a time on this, please