User talk:Aciram/Archives/2007/December

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Women in war

Hi. I saw your articles about Margareta Elisabeth Roos and Ulrika Eleonora Stålhammar, and I just wanted to tell you that I'm glad to see that someone besides me is interested in the subject of women in war. If you could add sources to these articles, that would be very helpful. You can learn how to cite sources at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thanks again for creating those articles, they were quite interesting. Asarelah 15:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

As you now have made over 200 edits to the English Wikipedia, and have been here for over one month, it is my pleasure to present you with this Service Medal to honor your contributions. Cut and paste it onto your user page and display it with pride.

This editor is a Novice Editor, and is entitled to display this Service Badge

You can also change the medal to a ribbon or a book if you prefer, just click on the blue link in the medal for more information. There are other grades of service medals, you can change this one into a higher grade as you gain more experience on Wikipedia. Again, congratulations! Asarelah 16:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant categories

Hello again. I noticed that you added the categories of "Women" and "Medieval Women" to the Veborg article. While Veborg is, of course, a woman and a medieval woman, it is not appopriate to add these categories because the category of "Women in Medieval warfare" is a subcategory of "Medieval women", and "Medieval women" is in turn, a subcategory of "Women". Articles are not supposed to be in a category when they are already in a subdivision of that same category. Don't feel embarressed, this is a very common mistake made by new editors. I made the same mistake myself when I first started out. Asarelah 14:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Go into your settings and turn on your email. I was hoping you could help me with some genealogy in Sweden.

I was hoping you might have more access to information in Swedish on Anders Örbom and his descendants.

--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 17:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taskfore

Hi,

Another Wikipedian and I just created a Salem Witch Trials task force. If you are interested in history, Massachusetts, colonial America, witchcraft, or instances of religiously motivated violence, then this is the task force for you!

So please check it out!

Sincerely,

Psdubow 00:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Anna Koldings

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Anna Koldings, by Chrisd87, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Anna Koldings is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Anna Koldings, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Anna Koldings itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

OK, I apologize for reverting the source you added to Emilie Högquist. The thing that made me confused is that your addition here can be considered defamation purpose since it lacks citing sources. Your adding source (Carin Österberg) in a particular section leads to the misunderstanding that the source is used for the whole general information in the article, not for the piece of maybe-libelous "her voice like chicken" whatever itself. I suggest you should use the tag <ref>your source here</ref> for the information you added and other editors won't have any reasons to remove your edits. And about Bollhuset, even if you are the one who started the article, other editors have the rights to fix or remove information that is not appropriate or violates Wikipedia policies. It seems that you translate articles from Swedish to English. Don't mind citing sources even they're in Swedish. Put the template {{Sv icon}} beside your sources to notify readers that the sources are in Swedish. If you don't cite any sources, your edits will be removed at length. Best wishes. @pple 11:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will be missed...

Aciram, I don't know how to say but I was truck with shock when reading the announcement on your userpage that you will no longer take part in Wikipedia. Though I've known you just one day so far, I was really impressed by your invaluable addition to Wikipedia's content. I'm going to miss you. I still hope that you'll come back someday. Best wishes. @pple 09:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And from me. Truly sorry to see you've left. A great contributor who will be missed. If you do decide to return someday, please drop me a line to say hello. —Moondyne 03:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

I'm glad that you've come back. What can I say, I've never seen such a prolific editor. Good job! Hope to see you regularly. Best regards. @pple complain 06:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What great news. Welcome! —Moondyne 13:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Elisa Bernerström

An article that you have been involved in editing, Elisa Bernerström, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Bernerström. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]