User talk:93.136.16.90
DISAGREE WITH MOVE. More to the point, I am puzzled by the suggestion of the categorization of Metaphysics. Might one assume that Wikipedia intends to change their definition of Metaphysics? Frankly, I think a lot of people are threatened by the notion that consciousness creates reality although Lanza's book pretty much lays it out in scientific terms. His position is not a philosophical one. It is one informed by direct experience and backed by science. Metaphysics may be the philosophy of Being but Biocentrism posits the origin of being. I read the book some time ago and have mulled over it since. I also had the opportunity to hear Dr. Lanza speak and take a number of follow-up questions. I am neither scientist nor philosopher. But I ask - if Biocentrism is NOT a theory of everything then what exactly does it leave out; what does it not explain? What is NOT scientifically explained by Biocentrism? Marmvr (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.