User talk:85.101.205.61

November 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.101.205.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was supposed to edit Kia to add the "Design, De?💡gn!" slogan.
I jokingly said that Ponyo was a BMW driver.
My IP was compromised, editing Ponyo's usertalk and adding block notices.
Unblock me before 2023.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.101.205.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I discovered the block when I attempted to edit the Kia page.
I had a CheckUser™ block because of a block évasion.
I understand why I was blocked.
It was because of a CheckUser abuse.
Admins even reverted my improvements (including typo fixes and vandalism reverts) due to this.
I will not continue to vandalize, and I will make useful contributions instead.

Decline reason:

Block is good. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

85.101.205.61 (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

 Confirmed block evasion of a user blocked for trolling. Note the obvious trolling in these unblock requests, even after the user promised to stop trolling. --Yamla (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)