User talk:82.113.121.24

Welcome

	Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, 82.113.121.24, and welcome to Wikipedia!I'm Banjeboi, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links you may find helpful:   The five pillars   Contributing here   Help pages   How to edit a page   Writing great articles   Editing tutorial I hope you enjoy contibuting here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Banjeboi 11:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Perpetual motion

Your entry has been removed (among other things, entries on other than talk pages and submitted images are not signed in the article text). You might want to place your entry in the appropriate section, "Recent examples". By the way, the Youtube video does not appear to be a demonstration of P.M., and there is clearly energy input into the system with the dunking of the enclosing ring. It is also unclear what is being demonstrated.

Thanks, Leonard G. (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Thats not my problem. I dont think you can teach the Ludwig Maximillians University, Munich, and they claim there is one, utube or not utube. You can see the perpetual motion here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ9E30j1sZw

I will try it again with this link. If you remove it again, its not my problem, but yours, soon.

w g

Susanne

Just put it in the right article and I will not object. This should go into History of perpetual motion machines, 21st century section, new subsection "2010s" (Leonard) (You can copy the old entry from the history) Best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your help, but in history... are only NOT WORKING machines. I think you dont trust the most famous university in Germany.

bw

Susanne

Ah, but the video shows nothing useful as to expectations, methods, or results. Is that ring moving by power from the device? It appears not, and the moving of the ring in and out of the water requires energy (to break the meniscus formed), and there is no explanation of what is going on (neither in the article, nor in the video). Looks like the usual hokum to me, since there is insufficient information to replicate the experiment, whatever it purports to be. That is not science. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonard G. (talk • contribs)

Whats your problem. The most famous university says that is science. Who are you do you think ? In Germany you can read every information to replicate you want. You only have to take a capillary and put this over a float, than you will see that this float is going up. What else do you need. The utube-video is not from the university but a replication. I think you does not know anything about negative pressure.

bw

Susanne

No no. Some anonymous internet user says the university says that but does not actually provide a way to verify that it was said. And youtube demonstrations are original research...would need to be published somewhere with a reputation for scientific accuracy. And even the video is too hopelessly missing details. Looks like just another haox to me (probably externally powered), as Leonard G. said above. Without actual published proof this is perpetual motion (violating laws of thermodynamics), one assumes it is not. DMacks (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Please consider:

Please consider becoming a registered user, as it would make communication more reliable (your IP address may change if your router power fails).

Thanks, Leonard G. (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)