User talk:81.158.74.37
April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rat Queens, you may be blocked from editing. Jerm (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Technically, you've violated the three-revert rule. Do not revert again for another 24 hours. Actually, you shouldn't revert even after that, until you get consensus on the talk page. Also, you know that discussions happen on talk pages, so you have just as much responsibility as CLCStudent for starting a discussion.
- As for why they're reverting, Wikipedia avoid opinionated language like "blessed." We also tend to avoid primary sources except for statements that require no interpretation whatsoever. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rat Queens. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.