User talk:80.79.6.117

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

22:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Materialscientist (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hello, I'm Gatemansgc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Crack epidemic in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 18:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hula hoop. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 18:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hula hoop, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hula hoop was changed by 80.79.6.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938384 on 2023-02-27T18:54:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Your edit to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Lightoil (talk) 03:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Drummingman (talk) 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi - I have reverted your addition to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics - I do not think an article on economic philosophy and mythology is justified, particularly because labeling things as myths is usually extremely controversial and I don't see how an article can reasonably discuss how this connects to economic ideology in any sourcable way, given the original research policy. casualdejekyll 20:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Already repair. 80.79.6.117 (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

The sources you provided do not exist. Please do not fabricate sourcing. casualdejekyll 22:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Pardon Casualdejekyll, its chat gpt. 80.79.6.117 (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to MV-media, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Dark Side of Chocolate. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)