User talk:79.129.26.46

Disagreement

Disagreement with your edits isn’t vandalism. Please reconsider your approach to interactions with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

If somebody disagreed with my edits for a good faith reason, they would point to a policy or guideline that they thought applied. Undoing four clearly explained edits for no reason at all is an act of bad faith. You did that. Do you have an explanation for it? It seems not. 79.129.26.46 (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Striking out edits that aren't yours

Please don't do that. I may not be familiar with what is happening here, but I'm trying to come up with a reason not to block you, which you're not making easy. El_C 03:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

A reason not to block me? I made perfectly good edits and have found myself insulted and attacked for it. If that makes you yearn to block, you should probably just give in to the temptation. Somebody misused their rollback tool to remove my post on a talk page, and yet it's me you attack for merely striking out obvious trolling. 79.129.26.46 (talk) 04:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not attacking you, but I am instructing you to never modify another user's comments, or you will definitely be blocked. El_C 04:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

And yet, the person who removed my comments entirely with their rollback tool received no warning of any kind. Odd, no? 79.129.26.46 (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't know — I have no idea what that entailed. El_C 04:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

So you didn't bother to familiarise yourself at all with the situation here? 79.129.26.46 (talk) 04:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I did not. El_C 04:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)