User talk:76.114.86.121

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sockpuppet

I suspect that this anonymous account is a sockpuppet. See here for my reasoning [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack1956 (talkcontribs) 20:54, 3 February 2008

And you still don't know what a sockuppet is. 76.114.86.121 (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You said that last time and I was proved correct...you were blocked from editing then, as this IP has been now. Jack1956 (talk) 22:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Whitechapel Murders (1888-91). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kbthompson (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your edit summary. See Talk:Jack the Ripper/Archive 4 for a discussion of the matter, amongst other places. The two issues are distinct. If you wish to make a case for the merger of the two articles, please do so on the relevant talk pages. Kbthompson (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KB, please stop using pointless warning templates when you know you are wrong. I pointed you to prior discussion in my edit removing it. I could put a big warning on your talk page about creating improper fork files, but trading pointless warning templates doesn't solve anything. 76.114.86.121 (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in view of your comment [2] that you will never deny editing anonymously if you forgot to log on, etc, are you prepared to state that you are also Dreamguy? Jack1956 (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I take it from your silence that the answer is that you are not prepared to admit it unless it is proven beforehand by a RfCU? Jack1956 (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.