User talk:74.69.160.254

Your submission at Articles for creation: Principal series (spectroscopy) (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Principal series (spectroscopy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Principal series (spectroscopy), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 74.69.160.254! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 01:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Principal series (spectroscopy)

Hello, 74.69.160.254. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Principal series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Hartland Snyder

The current text includes a statement regarding the "collapsar model" as if this collapsar theory of black holes is mainstream. This collapsar theory is relevant to Snyder's area of research but is not so prominent as to require any mention in a description of Snyder's work.

Visible-light astronomy

It makes no sense that JWST has a section (with title) in this article. A brief mention of JWST, e.g., as HST's successor, and the fact that it was chosen to be infrared, would make some sense, but a whole section seems ludicrous when there's no similar description of Keck, the ELT, or other truly relevant developments.