User talk:69.142.21.24

Peter Gabriel

I reverted your recent edits to Peter Gabriel as probable vandalism because no supporting cite was offered, and I couldn't find anything by Google. If you have substantiation for this claim, feel free to re-add the material with an appropriate cite. --Calair 08:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

External links

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in House (TV series). Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 19:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

You said: "Nice job being totally wrong about my edit to House, MD -- It's not my Web site I linked to, and it's not spam. That Web site is useful as an external link, cataloguing all the music used on the series by episode and scene. And by the way, I am one of the original editors to that article, and have probably added more text to that article than anyone on Wikipedia. So looks like you were wrong on all counts."

"Update: It seems other editors disagree with you as well since that link has reappeared in the external links section."

Under what criteria established by WP:EL do you contend that the link is appropriate? Also, you seem to be mistaken. As of right now, the link has not reappeared in the external links section, though it is possible the database is lagging as happens sometimes. If you feel the link is appropriate, please justify it on that page's discussion page. You may be able to achieve a consensus there. Thanks. --19:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The link IS there, it's the second from the bottom. How did you miss it twice? 69.142.21.24 07:52, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, I'll remove it. Why you thought it should be there twice is beyond me. --Yamla 15:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Mesirow Financial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mesirow Financial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesirow Financial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Hughsday listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hughsday. Since you had some involvement with the Hughsday redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)