User talk:56.0.163.15

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 56.0.163.15, is registered to United States Postal Service and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

While it is valid to identify the controversy around Greenwood's service, this section contains too much POV.

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Fluffing. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fram 16:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Adrian Paul

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Adrian Paul worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rosenknospe 10:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Charitable organization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo _talk 13:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Adriana Sage has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. LGF1992UK (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rhaphidophoridae has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. cf38^talk 17:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hajj, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 19:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that in this edit to The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melmann 18:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The_Inheritance_Trilogy

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick (Talk) 13:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.