User talk:50.179.252.14

Hello, Chicago/Gurnee/50.179.252.14, thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you are using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

Is User:Le Professeur70]] one of your accounts? That's the closest matching username to "Le Prof", but it's been inactive for many years. Clearly you're far from new here - you love Doc James, know ReFill, policy, and are coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia.--Elvey^(t•c) 17:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Thank you for your suggestion regarding The Finest Hours (2016 film). When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Appreciate your edits to the page, but most of the time you spent adding CN's to everything (a little excessive in my opinion) you could have actually found the actual reference instead. I understand WP:VERIFY, but we're here to "build" a dictionary, not just "correct" or add a red pen to the work. Would love it if you could contribute some citations to the page in addition to the tags. Thanks. Garchy (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Philanthropy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

section, but is clearly, rather, associated with material of the "Classical… " section. (Appears likely to be the un-cited source for the "Definitions" section and lede content, and for

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 50.179.252.14. You have new messages at Template_talk:Update_after#Tag_non-functional_as_of_this_date.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

April 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Todd Rose, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Judit Polgár may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Kasparov when the videotape evidence was made available to him.<ref name="Berry_GM_Mar261994">{{cite news | newspaper=Globe and Mail | location=Toronto | last=Berry | first=Jonathan | title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of attention banners

Why do find it necessary to reintroduce attention banners to sections that are already included in the lead? Boghog (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ruby Aldridge page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive922.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Discussion is over. Kindly stop messing with the archive. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]