User talk:49.178.86.147

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Do you really like horses? I love animals.49.178.86.147 (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sail

Check your edit carefully. You added stray characters. That's wtf is my problem. So watch your shitty comments until you're smart enough to realize when you've made a mistake. MartinezMD (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then do let me know beforehand and watch your shitty mouth, Mr Smarty pants.49.178.86.147 (talk) 12:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know beforehand you plan to make a bad edit and I will. MartinezMD (talk) 12:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know when you're not right in the head again. Then I will endeavour to let you know.49.178.86.147 (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't make a shitty comment in the first place, you won't get one in return. It's that simple. MartinezMD (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't act like a shitty person, you won't get a shitty comment. Like you say, it's simple.49.178.86.147 (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, in Wikipedia we try to use good etiquette. Above, I see personal attacks in both directions. We all experience the emotions that you each felt during this exchange. The trick is to suppress them and act in a civil manner, so as not to descend into a tit-for-tat that we would not be proud to show our grandchildren! Here's wishing you both well. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the above exchange could have been as follows:

"You wondered why I reverted your contribution. it's because you added stray characters. It's a good idea to review each edit before saving it."

"I see my mistake. Thanks for the tip!"

Perhaps that would have gotten a constructive point across without evoking enmity.

Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heyy, thanks for this.49.178.86.147 (talk) 21:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your recent editing history at Missionaries of Charity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DeCausa (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

Is there any way to commend someone rather than later? Tiderolls 13:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?? Not sure I follow you. The UAE commended them. Because the Saudi government only admitted it later.49.178.86.147 (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.