User talk:31.25.3.111

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sobieski Stuarts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fridtjof Nansen ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ermysted's Grammar School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cotton mill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Prunesqualor billets_doux 10:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Zimbabwe national football team ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Neutral Milk Hotel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nathan Barley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neutral Milk Hotel, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1eetalk 11:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nathan Barley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Bruce1eetalk 11:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


June 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

November 2012

Hello, I'm Vacation9. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Sleep (novel) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vacation9 (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin Lee Collins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andre Wisdom, you may be blocked from editing. —Theopolisme 15:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 17:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dracula (1931 film), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta 14:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fiergrin Brownlock,Master of Buckland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 31.25.3.111. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fiergrin Brownlock,Master of Buckland".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fiergrin Brownlock,Master of Buckland}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 레비Revicon 12:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1970s in sports has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sauce. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sauce was changed by 31.25.3.111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966441 on 2016-07-13T14:30:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sauce, you may be blocked from editing. Sanket Edits Wiki (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sauce. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keelham Farm Shop (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 09:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 31.25.3.111, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 09:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to West Marton

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, West Marton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. –72 (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keelham Farm Shop, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Keelham Farm Shop

Hello, 31.25.3.111. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keelham Farm Shop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 07:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.