User talk:2Fingers2

April 2014

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Korytsa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 2Fingers2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 12:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

references

please add a reference URL at the very least when adding content to articles --Львівське (говорити) 23:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

il'll do what I want

Adding unreferenced material will ultimately be deleted. Your edits have been fine but you need to reference them. --Львівське (говорити) 23:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Siege of Sloviansk. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. RGloucester — ☎ 04:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Basilan

The article you created, Battle of Basilan, is well written, and improved by changes I made, but it is imperative that you add references to this article to substantiate it. Can you do that? Go ahead if you can, or leave a note for me right here if you cannot do so.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am former ex-soldier from the AFP (Armed Forces of the Philippines) and take enjoy writing accurate Info. on military operations in my country. All the info. Relating to the article I got from Phil.news they had a whole two page about operations and I summarized that in my own words. You can check on google they have tens of articles in relation to the topic.-2Fingers2-----28 April 2014

It is good that you can write clear and accurate articles on military operations, in part because of your military background. However, to remain in Wikipedia articles, you must add references, or the tag of WP:No original research may be applied. I don't want your article to be challenged and perhaps deleted, but either you or I or someone I recruit must add references. Can you do that?--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aside, use :, not * in replies here, and sign with --~~~~--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, better said then done.

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Basilan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Benigno Aquino and 1st Infantry Division

Battle of Asadabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asadabad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 29 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Battle of Basilan page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Asadabad

The article Battle of Asadabad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources whatsoever.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 06:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Free Egyptian Army for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free Egyptian Army is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Egyptian Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]