User talk:2603:7000:2143:8500:19EE:4BCD:4D10:E1D3

April 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rostov Zoo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tula Exotarium. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your statements are at odds with wp policy. As I have done repeatedly now, I urge you to read wp:burden. Your assertion that the existence of a citation needed template means that text cannot be removed is - a fabrication. There is zero truth in that assertion. Further, uncited material may be removed. Further, it is your burden - you, as the person restoring it - to supply proper RS refs. You have restored material now repeatedly - without the requisite RS refs. Kindly self-revert. You are violating wp policy, repeatedly, and knowingly. And to top it off, leaving irrelevant warnings. If you are not so inclined, perhaps it would help to bring in admin HJ Mitchell, who has granted you pending reviewer status, so he can explain it better (if that is the problem) and be aware that he has granted that status to an editor who is - after discussion - disinclined to heed wp:burden. Thank you. 2603:7000:2143:8500:19EE:4BCD:4D10:E1D3 (talk) 06:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:BURDEN carefully. If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it. If you like to quote policy to justify your disruptive behavior, I would be inclined to refer to WP:COMMONSENSE. If you are only here to remove content, then you may be blocked. 0xDEADBEEF (T C) 07:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Spokoyni (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)