User talk:2402:3A80:6FD:B303:55D:9023:51BF:FF3E

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

December 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Draft:Cyclone Jawad—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 10:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyclone Jawad. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Beraniladri19

Hello, 2402:3A80:6FD:B303:55D:9023:51BF:FF3E. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone Jawad.
Message added 11:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 11:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi 2402:3A80:6FD:B303:55D:9023:51BF:FF3E! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need help regarding Cyclone Jawad, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.