User talk:24.138.192.89
For those that do end up giving me a block
There's a thing called Google when it comes to sourceful information. Use it. But I guess most people are against that search engine that provides countless of useful information, no matter how vague it is and just block people for trivial reasons too. If I get blocked over something obviously useful, so be it. No article will improve if they continue to deny any and all sources, no matter how crucial. 24.138.192.89 (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- And yes, most of Wikipedia's admins are run by elitists. That is all. 24.138.192.89 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Once again, people displaying their elitism because they don't want to provide sources themselves and just goes trigger-happy over the simplest edits. Oh, and my Wikipedia account hasn't been recovered years ago, so congratulations Wikipedia. You're gradually damaging your reputation. 24.138.192.89 (talk)
- Don't bother with them, bro. Majority of Wikipedia's admins are filled with entitled Karens that refuse to be anywhere useful. Their own fault that half of their articles are left unfinished and can't be bothered to make any and all improvements yet have no problems in removing useful info that's deemed as "unsourceful". If Wikipedia's community are filled with hostile and ungrateful kiddies, they're clearly trying to scrape the bottom of the barrel WAY too much. 2600:1702:2E70:3F70:4D36:595B:9AC3:52EB (talk) 04:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.