User talk:216.52.142.11

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Sphinx (senior society). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ζεύς 00:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Laura Bush, has been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. † Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 19:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not experiment in actual article space. There are different spaces called "Sandboxes" which are much better to do this in. Unfortunately, if this occurs again, you will be blocked for an unspecified period of time. (If you wanted to create an account you could talk to me, and I'd help you get started.) Danieltiger45 14:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

This is a warning not to add frivolous material to articles such as you did to Kate Moss. Comments like that don't belong anywhere in Wikipedia. Piano non troppo (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Kate Moss constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 21:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kate Moss. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. It Is Me Here (talk) 21:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kate Moss.  – iridescent 21:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Blair & Company

Please note that your edits to William Blair & Company violate several key policies on wikipedia including WP:SPAM and WP:COPYRIGHT. Your contributions are welcome so long as they are consistent with Wikipedia's content policies. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓTALK ◄| 17:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Significant edits to William Blair & Company were made from William Blair's network:

CustName:   William Blair & Company 
Address:    222 West Adams Street 
City:       Chicago 
StateProv:  IL 
PostalCode: 60606 
Country:    US 
RegDate:    2005-01-05 
Updated:    2005-01-05 
NetRange:   216.52.142.0 - 216.52.142.255 
CIDR:       216.52.142.0/24 
NetName:    INAP-CHI-WILLIAMBLAIR-1547 
NetHandle:   NET-216-52-142-0-1 
Parent:     NET-216-52-0-0-1 
NetType:    Reassigned 
Comment: 
RegDate:    2005-01-05 
Updated:    2005-01-05 
RTechHandle: INO3-ARIN 
RTechName:   InterNap Network Operations Center 
RTechPhone:  1-877-843-4662 
RTechEmail:  noc@internap.com

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Isaac Carothers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Geek Squad appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. allennames 22:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page William Blair & Company has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was fine as it was alerting us to content in violation of BLP policy. Follow up with questions to me or functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org or oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 16:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bobby Rush, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Tim1357 talk 23:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The God Delusion with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 22:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cryptographic hash function because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald G. Dunn (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 216.52.142.11, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald G. Dunn, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald G. Dunn

Hello, 216.52.142.11. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Donald G. Dunn".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.