User talk:216.38.53.127

Bold text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

216.38.53.127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please explain this to me. I am block for a "Block evasion" witch I was accused of. Now please explain this to me. I got the max ban witch you can see here http://francislighthouse.org/images/images/me.png and some one else did the same thing from what I can see got the shortest witch you can see here. http://francislighthouse.org/images/images/me2.png You please explain to me why I got the max and the other did not. If he/she got the shortest than I want the shortest that is fair. The my IP is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3

Decline reason:

You seem to be asking for your "other" ip address to be unblocked. You appear to be circumventing blocks via a proxy provided by unblockorbust.com. That is block evasion. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you, for keeping this up.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

216.38.53.127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you for explaning what a "Block evasion" is know I know not to due this. The only resion I am useing this proxicy is for some one to see that I am trying to use my talk page but it is blocked. Can you please unblock the talk page so I am not dueing a "Block evasion". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3 So I can show that I am trying to fix the problem insted of being a problem.

Decline reason:

You have a large number of accounts, mostly in the Francislighthouse series, but with some IPs as well. You are guilty of blatant, multiple sockpuppetry, and are in addition attempting to evade your block by using a proxy server. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 22:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

216.38.53.127 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why do you admin's only belive other admin? I am not guilty of blatant, multiple sockpuppetry, attempting to evade your block by using a proxy server. You still did not answer my questions. Why did I get the loger ban http://francislighthouse.org/images/images/me.png And the other got the shortest http://francislighthouse.org/images/images/me2.png You are accuseing me of things I did not eaven do and some things was from last year. I want to follow the rules but you are not giveing me a chance to. By not unblocking my IP's talk page. I have not other way that to use proxiys. Also I can not appeal blocks so you all are forceing me to due this. Last year I was band for the making 2 FrancisLightHouse accounts. The my IP is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.99.83.3

Decline reason:

I believe you answered your own question. Yes, you were blocked for making the two Francislighthouse accounts. Yes, you are evading your block now by using proxies. Yes, this is why you are currently blocked, and will continue to be blocked so long as you keep doing it. Perpetuating the reason you're being blocked is a very poor way to ask to be unblocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked because you are only interested in writing about your own web site. Because you have been told this many, many times, and have not understood, I am doing what I can to encourage you to stop editing Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)