User talk:2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:C90E:1955:4745:23C2
Vitamin article
Thank you for identifying some of the glaring flaws and omissions in the Vitamin article. In 2019, I posted on the Talk page that it should never have been rated a Good Article (my statement is in Archive 4). Instead of getting deep into this one, I have labored on bring the individual vitamin Articles to GA status (9 done, Vit A soon to be in review, leaves Thiamine, vitamin E and vitamin D). After that maybe come back to this one. An obvious problem is that over the years, editors add content, but don't clean-up or coordinate with existing content. What I've had to do on the vitamin articles typically involves removing 1/4 to 1/3 of the references, replacing with newer & higher quality refs, and rewriting half or more of the text. David notMD (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.