User talk:2001:558:6045:56:A494:E24D:2C11:BD29

May 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:558:6045:56:A494:E24D:2C11:BD29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here 2001:558:6045:56:A494:E24D:2C11:BD29 (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This IP address is no longer blocked. With the attitude demonstrated below, you may want to find another project to contribute to, though. Huon (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This was just a test by a professional fact checker to see if Wikipedia could handle criticism. It cannot. You cannot tolerate dissent even to the point of admitting bias, but of course you will not. Wikipedia earns its reputation.

You get a golden raspberry for being such a hypocrite, and awarding barn stars to loud mouth conservatives.

Its now laffable, how I can easily show how biased and hypocritical Wikipedia is.

Most of the changes reverted were mine. Dont bother. Facts do not matter, bias, and loud mouths prevail.

At least I can point others to the deleted information, and show how bad things are, and will continue to be.

June 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Timeline of World War II (1939), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarl N. (discuss) 21:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.