User talk:199.67.138.49

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sam Kouvaris, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sam Kouvaris was changed by 199.67.138.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924976 on 2012-04-17T13:38:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Michael Jasper, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Your recent editing history at Mair caste shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

Hello, I'm Allen4names. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Blood+, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Allen4names (IPv6 contributions) 17:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Python Coding

Hey man, you should really consider applying for a job at Google. Your groundbreaking work on Radix sort was as innovative as it was constructive. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radix_sort&oldid=557227485

October 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Frigidaire, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 15:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm A520. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Darren Fletcher, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 18:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alibaba Group because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Salim (film), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 06:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Great Salt Lake

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ~NottNott ( -) 19:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:11F0:55F3:E2DE:523:519. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:180:11F0:55F3:E2DE:523:519 (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pooja Jhaveri, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 22:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lake St. Louis, Missouri, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Bishop's School (La Jolla), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See WP:LISTPEOPLE. CodeTalker (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.