Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!
This host, http-v.fe.bosch.de (194.39.218.10), is registered to Robert Bosch GMBH and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.
If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.
-- Benon 10:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2006
Your 2 February 2006 test edit to the Mouse article
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mouse. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. haz(user talk) 15:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your 3 July 2006 nonsense edit to the Google Scholar article
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Google Scholar. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Francs2000 12:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Dynamical simulation. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. - GIen 11:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your 8 September 2006 addition of copyrighted material to the Siong Lim Temple article
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Siong Lim Temple article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Martinp23 07:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your 8 November 2006 test edits
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kukini 16:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
March 2007
Your 7 March 2007 addition of non-notable biographical information to the bio of someone else at Naveen Perwani
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --> — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib]ツ 22:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
chat room
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to User talk:Crappy13, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --> Xiahou 02:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello you recently added the following to the EVE Online todo list:
#CCP need to [[act]] on macro-miners. Opening petitions when they just close it without action or reply is unacceptable.
That page is a todo list for the EVE Online article not for the game itself. If you wish to make comment on CCPs handling of your petitions please either submit a polite petition (in my experience if you are polite and clear they never close the petition without answer - see #2553 on OMGRawr.net) if your problems are not answered, keiron AT ccpgames DOT com is always willing to listen to constructive requests or comments. -- Richard Slater (Talk to me!) 19:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Hordaland (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear 194.39.218.10,
Some of your edits on the page
1987 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally.
If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nazi Germany, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nazi Germany was changed by 194.39.218.10(u)(t) deleting 34806 characters on 2008-09-08T02:51:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear 194.39.218.10,
Some of your edits on the page
December 7 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally.
If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 12:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Davros, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Davros was changed by 194.39.218.10(u)(t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-07T16:17:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Template sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Template sandbox was changed by 194.39.218.10(u)(t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-23T12:01:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Camw (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear 194.39.218.10,
Some of your edits on the page
April 21 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally.
If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 12:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
March 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. yettie0711 (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Dear 194.39.218.10,
Some of your edits on the page
April 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally.
If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to São Paulo FC, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Borderline ginge (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Eddie Howe, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Eddie Howe. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 13:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Masters of Hardcore has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc3cHUQFAAI (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Exergy efficiency has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy![message] 11:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
However... it doesn't seem to have correctly formatted references.
All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked.
If you put a reference like this:
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>
He likes tea.<ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
Video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen"
...then the reference will automatically be displayed as a small number[1], and the number will link to the details, wherever there is a {{reflist}} — there should be one of those in a section titled == References ==.
It is a very important policy of Wikipedia that all information is verifiable — i.e., that all material added to articles must be attributable to a source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
Your submission will be reviewed as soon as possible, and we'll try to help with it, but it would help us a lot if you could add inline references.
If you need any other kind of help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question. Best, Chzz ► 17:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beacon (Communication). Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ArmbrustTalk to meContribs 13:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Looted art, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
April 2012
I have removed your edits to Keith Lemon. I'm WP:AGF you are trying to improve the article, however your information is questionable because it is supported only by a single blog posts. WP does not consider blogs to be valid references due to the lack of editorial oversight. I have run a quick check and cannot find a legitimate news source that references the information you are posting. Since this is a WP:BLP, all new information must be carefully supported with valid sources. Thanks and have a nice day :-) Nightenbelle (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2-Headed Shark Attack. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dinocroc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
November 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Reineh , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
December 2012
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Caffeine-Free Coca-Cola, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, WikipelliTalk 13:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caffeine-Free Coca-Cola with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikipelliTalk 13:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to NHL 13, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, WikipelliTalk 14:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
February 2013
Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Howard King (referee), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 17:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
June 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brendan Rodgers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beacon (Communication), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HISL, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 194.39.218.10. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Beacon (Communication).
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beacon (Communication)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 194.39.218.10. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled HISL.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HISL}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
March 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dielectric, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 194.39.218.10. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "COMASSO".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/COMASSO}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
September 2014
Hello, I'm Download. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page AUTOSAR because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. -download 09:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2015
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yeovil Town because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pappu Yadav with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimaltalk 15:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
October 2015
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Contoso, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Contoso was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed email address removed) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
February 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Croissant has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
September 2016
Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kelsall have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justin15w (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Sunmist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Adam Christodoulou— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sunmist (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
December 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Electric charge. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Judy Garland— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 11:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 194.39.218.10. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Alfred Csicska".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Spacecowboy420. I noticed that you recently removed content from Joel Osteen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sam Allardyce, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Prakash Raj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Evesham seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 15:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
May 2019
Hello, I'm Path slopu. An edit you recently made to Ubuntu version history seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PATHSLOPU 08:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Emerging power, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss the issues mentioned rather than forcing your edits (see WP:CONSENSUS). A discussion is already going on the talk page and you should find consensus there rather than reverting edits unilaterally.Gotitbro (talk) 08:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Emerging power, you may be blocked from editing. You do not seem to have taken any lesson from your recent block for the very same disruption. Please stop, or your next block will be significantly longer. Grittrue (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One does not need an account to contribute to talk page discussions. I recommend you discontinue reverting without determining consensus on the article talk page. Additionally, stop characterizing edits as vandalism which do not meet Wikipedia's definition. See WP:NOTVAND. If you persist in these behaviors you jeopardize your editing privilege. Tiderolls 13:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
February 2020
Hello, I'm KNHaw. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bosch Rexroth without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KNHaw(talk) 17:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. An edit you recently made to Kalman filter seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GorillaWarfare(talk) 03:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Transylvania. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hemanthah (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.
We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them.
Such an IP address can be shared by several users.
If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --> — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 22:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Yorkshire pudding worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Frankenpuppy (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fracture mechanics, you will be blocked from editing. Wizard191 (talk) 16:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Looted art, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dinoshark, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dinocroc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:194.39.218.10 reported by User:Gotitbro (Result: ). Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 08:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
