User talk:158.93.6.11

Edit warring on 2007 South Korean hostage crisis in Afghanistan

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Wikipedia is not a place to proclaim your opinion. I did try to help resolve the dispute over the wording in the article, but it's evident that you do not wish to cooperate with the mediation process. If you want to tell the world that you disagree with the hostages' execution, then please go create your own webpage somewhere else to that effect. Wikipedia is an unbiased encyclopedia, and ranting of the kind that I saw in this edit is not tolerated. Please refrain from making any further unconstructive edits to Wikipedia articles, or preventative blocks and protections may be issued to keep the article unbiased. Shadow1 (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Acid–base reaction has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 18:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Acute intermittent porphyria has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Oldlaptop321 (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ethidium bromide, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Tomaxer (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Alpha-synuclein, you will be blocked from editing. Cyclopia^talk 15:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Could you explain why are you reverting that information from the Alpha-synuclein page? You can explain your reasons on the article talk page. Thanks. --Cyclopia^talk 15:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

It would also help if you can use edit summaries and strike comments instead of deleting them, if you redact them. Thanks! --Cyclopia^talk 23:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rock the Reception has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xuRvSK85wA. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Rock the Reception do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MrStalker ^(talk) 13:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

August 2011

Your recent edit to the page Solomon Mujuru with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Garth Brooks, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- jbergste ^{(u) (t) (c)} 18:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Georgia Health Sciences University with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Monty₈₄₅ 18:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Johnson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chadderton with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Clarince63 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Clarince63 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Clarince63 (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Clarince63. Clarince63 (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

158.93.6.11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unblock me because I am the Opossum Minister and cannot account for my actions. 158.93.6.11 (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No valid reason given. Kinu ^t/_c 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2012

Hello, I'm Thine Antique Pen. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Anatomical snuff box because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Steve Spurrier because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to K. B. Ganesh Kumar

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because it did not meet one or more of our policies. Feel free to read more there, or contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Jackson Peebles (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2011 Boston Red Sox season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 14:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NickCT. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Carnival Breeze, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, NickCT (talk) 02:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Abce2. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Neuro-Behçet's disease without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Abce2 (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jamia Hamdard because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Carrollton High School (Carrollton, Georgia) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Susquehanna River— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Casting Crowns have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nascent state (chemistry), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please read Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Nascent_hydrogen, where everyone agrees that the deprecented content should go away quickly. Everyone else, read it too! 158.93.6.11 (talk) 22:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Nascent state (chemistry) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VQuakr (talk) 22:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. VQuakr (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Purity ball— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Polymerase chain reaction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peacock (talk) 20:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shelby Kutty, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.