User talk:134.223.230.154

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frequency Selective Surfaces (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. CutestPenguinHangout 17:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 134.223.230.154, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — CutestPenguinHangout 17:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


March 2018

Hello, I'm OcarinaOfTime. I noticed that in this edit to Dark chocolate, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my edit summary, or look at the revision history on that page? 134.223.230.154 (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen no indication that you read my edit summary, or that you've ever read the text of the template you're using. It instructs me to post on your talk page, but your talk page instructs me not to post there. You can use a custom template if the default ones don't suit your needs. Taking a little care while using your automated tools can go a long way. 134.223.230.154 (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.