User talk:131.94.186.30

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Allie DiMeco, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phi Gamma Delta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 11:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Transnistria has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Female genital cutting, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Female genital cutting was changed by 131.94.186.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875336 on 2010-11-22T09:59:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Calculus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at For Colored Girls. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: For Colored Girls was changed by 131.94.186.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86156 on 2010-12-08T18:24:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of English monarchs worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fourteen Points, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fourteen Points was changed by 131.94.186.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968983 on 2011-08-26T16:49:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fourteen Points with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Monty845 16:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lindsey Evans, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lindsey Evans was changed by 131.94.186.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921898 on 2011-09-13T05:54:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sing for the Moment, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sing for the Moment was changed by 131.94.186.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897924 on 2011-09-18T02:19:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Smart (automobile), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sandy (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Telfordbuck. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ronnie Ortiz-Magro because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Telfordbuck (talk) 06:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stiltsville. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I plan to add different aspects of the "political structure" spectrum. I'd also like to add the origins of political structures and briefly about their purposes and how their purposes have evolved over the course of time.

April 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Palm Beach Central High School, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Blue Edits (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Von Neumann

Hello,

Why did you remove references to Von Neumann on P versus NP problem and Kurt Gödel? I cannot think of any good reason, but perhaps you can enlighten others as to your reasoning. Fichid (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Lachielmao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, City Girls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lachielmao (talk) 06:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.