User talk:119.17.33.134
April 2018
Hello, I'm Bapreme. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alain de Botton without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BAPreme (T / C) 12:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Alain de Botton. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 09:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
June 2018
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael Greger, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 14:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dean Ornish. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Home Lander (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Caldwell Esselstyn. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Home Lander (talk) 14:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dean Ornish. Serols (talk) 14:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Home Lander (talk) 14:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Legal threats.
Any threats of legal action will end up with your ability to edit wikipedia being curtailed. The Harriet Hall SBM article has been discussed extensively on the talk page (including a formal RFC discussion) and is not likely to be removed from the article any time soon. If Greger doesnt want bullshit claims debunked by qualified professionals publically, he should not make public claims that are easily disprovable. Only in death does duty end (talk) 14:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 14:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.