User talk:109.77.205.42
August 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 08:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Wow. Just wow. Accusing me of vandalism for pointing out that Star Wars is not a film about amputees, see Wikipedia:CATDEFINING! Claiming Star Wars is about Cyborgs (Vader) is bit silly too but I didn't even revert that Category change (because calling General Grevious a cyborg is technically correct, if still largely irrelevant). Please go back and read the diffs. User:The_Editor_155 has made a whole lot of Category edits, look at his edit history, and look at all the other editors who have reverted his over enthusiastic Category changes. There was absolutely no need to accuse anyone of vandalism here. -- 109.77.205.42 (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with the IP editor here. Forrest Gump is a better example of films about amputees. Star Wars Episode III certainly isn't. As such, I have accepted the edit that removes the category from that article. Best regards, Jip Orlando (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.