User talk:103.217.166.56

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to International House, University of Queensland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kerry (talk) 05:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Clayfield (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I cannot see evidence of significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources, which is needed to establish generalWP:GNG notability. If such sources are being cited, please point them out. Similarly for specific notability of writers, please take a look at the criteria at WP:AUTHOR (applies to book authors, journos, screenwriters, etc.), and clearly state which of the four criterion is satisfied, and what evidence supports that.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 103.217.166.56! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Matthew Clayfield

Information icon Hello, 103.217.166.56. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matthew Clayfield, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:103.217.166.56"