User talk:ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ

Dylan Mulvaney moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dylan Mulvaney, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lori and George Schappell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to East Anatolian Fault did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on 1-Bromopropane

Please discuss changes to articles after they are reverted on the article talk page, rather than simply waiting to input the change again at a later time. Also please avoid removing sourced material without a reason. XeCyranium (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the sentence carefully. It says "phased out (...) under the Montreal Protocol". This is not a sourced sentence and perchloroethylene is not affected by the Montreal Protocol. Nobody removed a sourced sentence.

Don't forget to sign your comments on talk pages. Please do not remove sourced content again, if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia sources for content in the lead are often found in the body. I've reverted your edit again, I hope I won't have to fix it another time. XeCyranium 02:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For your dedication to LGBTQ+ topics, and in recognition of your identity as a transgender Wikipedian! ^-^

 Atomic putty? Rien!  20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Carbon tetrachloride, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a beginner editor. I provided a source that proves it in the edit summary. I don't know what do you want by "reliable source". It's a TV show, a Fandom wiki page is enough. Saint concrete (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don´t think that a Fandom wiki page is a reliable source in the Carbon tetrachloride article. I think the content is WP:UNDUE. I did not look into your editing history but several of your good faith additions to the article appear to be unsourced or inappropriately sourced. Every medical, pharmaceutical or toxicological claim should comply with WP:MEDRS, primary sources are generally not recommended and sources from a 100 years ago are rarely helpful. Additionally there is no shortage of modern, high quality sources about carbon tetrachloride. Please see WP:BURDEN and stop adding unsourced or inappropriately sourced content. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of these were medical claims, just historical uses. The Fandom page is for the Popular Culture part, nothing medical. I didn't add anything unsourced there, I add my sources always. "modern sources" are often paywalled and inaccessible even with services like sci-hub. There is no modern record of carbon Tetrachloride's historical anaesthetic use. Saint concrete (talk) 04:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dry cleaning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IARC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translated pages

Obviously using one language's article as a basis for another language's article is a good start. But be sure you note that you are translating rather than writing content from scratch in your edit-summary. See Help:Translation for more details. DMacks (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 11:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you too! ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 12:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox synax

The Wikipedia syntax for templates is: "vertical-bar parameter-name equals-sign parameter-value", not vertical-bars like parentheses around the name=value, and one cannot pass sets of name=value to another name. For example, when you created 1,1,2-Trifluoroethane with:

| Formula = |C=2| |H=3| |F=3|

you have a syntax error that is flagged as Category:Pages using Chembox with unknown parameters. Each "element=number" is its own parameter, not a set of things for "Formula" (conceptual mistake), and having two consecutive vertical bars is always a mistake (flagged as an error). Instead, you can use something like:[1]

|C=2 |H=3 |F=3

Please try it on Bromotrifluoroethylene to clear your same error there. DMacks (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Almost there. You have:

| Section2       = {{Chembox Properties
|C=2 |Br=1 |F=3|
| MolarMass      =

Two consecutive vertical bars is an error. After the F=3 is not needed, because there one on the next line before MolarMass. DMacks (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! DMacks (talk) 02:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ. Thank you for your work on Trifluoroethylene. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]