User:Titodutta/CVU/Students/The StormCatcher

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Let's start:

Read

Please read these two pages, feel free to ask question.

--Tito Dutta (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I've read both articles. I have no questions. The StormCatcher (talk) 04:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Please read these articles:


  • Do you use any tool like Twinkle, Huggle, STiki to fight vandalism?
  • I've read both articles, thanks. And no, I don't use any external programs or anything. I usually go to recent changes, hide registered users, and look at every edit. If it is clearly blatant vandalism, I revert it and leave a user warning template there depending on the situation and how many times incidents like that have occurred before.The StormCatcher (talk) 04:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Hey Tito, you there? Please continue training me. By the way, I've started using Twinkle. The StormCatcher (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Reverting 5 edits

  • Edit 1: Used TW to revert 2 edits to Rebecca Atkinson. Vandal changed her name to "Eggington", clear vandalism. Diff
  • Edit 2: Used TW to revert 2 edits to Dog breed. Blatant vandalism shown in the diff.
  • Edit 4: Reverted edits to Calgary Flames. Vandal changed the amount of trophies won by the team from 2 to 1 million. Reverted here.
  • Edit 5: Reverted 1 edit to a previous version at White Ox. The vandal blanked the page and replaced it with gibberish. Diff is here.

The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 08:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Looks good, Could you check a few discussions at WP:AIV and WP:RFPP? See how they report and discuss. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Test

Go through this User:Titodutta/CVU#Test and tell me how many could you answer correctly? --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Very good. Please ask if you have any question related to Vandalism or Wikipedia. --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your questions

  • Ok. You are doing well. Please check Mouma Das, recent reverts, protection and block and assess the situation. Did the admins handle it properly? If not, what could be improved? --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
  • @Titodutta: Looks like we had 2 people edit warring over this article. I would say admins handled it properly by protecting the page, but the users could've gotten more warnings.

Read

Following your rollback request, please read WP:ES and WP:FIES. --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)