User:Randykitty/RfA Standards

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page shows the criteria that can influence me to support or oppose editors RFAs.

NOTE: There are exceptions where I might not vote according to these standards.
Things that will influence me to oppose. Things that will influence me to vote neutral, or help me oppose/support. Things that will influence me to support.
The editor has less than 5000 edits. The editor has few edits to the Wikipedia space. The editor has 5000 or more edits.
The editor has few edits other than reverting vandalism. The editor is a rollbacker. 3000+ edits to the Mainspace.
The editor doesn't use edit summaries 100% of the time. The editor has promised to use them 100% of the time, during the RFA. The editor uses edit summaries 100% of the time.
The editor tags articles incorrectly for CSD. The editor isn't interested in CSD work. The editor tags articles for CSD per policy.
The editor has been actively editing for less than 9 months. The editor has been actively editing for 9-12 months. The editor has been actively editing for more than 12 months.
The editor was blocked less than 12 months ago. The editor was blocked more than 12 months ago. The editor has never been blocked.
The editor has a track record of being uncivil. The editor is usually civil but can break when under pressure. The editor is able to work well under pressure, and reacts civilly during disputes.
The editor answers questions uncivilly and interprets policy incorrectly. Or they answer using "cut and paste" policy. Or if they just plain blatantly lie. The editor answers questions in a way that shows that they don't fully understand the policy. The editor answers questions politely and according to policy, but also tell how to interpret the policies and how they would use them.
The editor responds to opposes in an attacking manner. The editor responds to almost every oppose. The editor responds to opposes in a civil manner.
The editor views adminship as power, or a status symbol. The editor views adminship as a maintenance tool but also sees it as a way to "lead" other users. The editor views adminship as helping with maintenance.
The editor helps out with only a few topics or WikiProjects. The editor helps out in various areas of the Wikipedia space, but usually sticks to one topic, or WikiProject. The editor helps out in a wide range of topics and in various parts of Wikipedia.
The editor has closed XFDs inappropriately, and doesn't seem to have improved. The editor doesn't close XFDs. The editor has good knowledge of how to close XFDs and has closed them correctly.
The editor does not think that it is necessary to make sure that BLPs are 100% correct and verified, and has possibly closed BLP AFDs as such. The editor holds no opinion on the way BLPs are treated. The editor views BLPs as needing to be 100% correct and verified, and their edits concur with these views. If the editor views BLP AFDs as default to delete when no consensus, it will also influence me to support.
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User:Randykitty/RfA_Standards"