User:PoliceSheep99/TalkArchive/3

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Adoption

Hello! I saw that you're looking for adoption and was wondering if I might offer myself as an option. I'm familiar with some automated programs (STiki, TW, AWB, HG are the main ones), and our interests seem to overlap vaguely, inasmuch as we're both interested in history and politics. I can hopefully help you out some with whatever it is you're interested in some capacity. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the offer. I would appreciate your teachings Compassionate727. Is there anything I have to do to accept PoliceSheep99 (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

@PoliceSheep99: Sorry for the delay! The answer is no, there is not anything in particular expected of you, although I wanted to ensure that there's nothing in particular expected of me before I said as much. This relationship can take whatever former we find most convenient. Doing a quick scan of your 500 most recent contributions, it looks like a lot of WikiGnome-type stuff: a lot of counter-vandalism recently, looks you did NPP-style stuff earlier. Is this generally in line with what you want to do? Do you have any interest in writing articles (new or otherwise)? That will give me some idea of where to go from here. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 22:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Compassionate727, I am interested in making current articles better and making new articles. I have tried this by, as you said, generally combated vandalism however I would like to try to venture out from that and go into making articles/ making stubs longer. I have tried this a few times with some being okay such as Andrew K.C. Nyirenda and some being nominated for deletion such as Saman Arastoo. Any help or guidance in any of these areas would be greatly appreciated. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 22:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
I promise I've seen this and will respond… soon. …Hopefully tonight. Need to get back to homework now, will be in touch soon. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay, so. Writing articles on Wikipedia is very hard: not only is an encyclopedia article a very different piece of writing than most of the stuff you write in a high school or college English course, but Wikipedia has this labyrinthine network of standards (we call them policies) about everything from how many sources you need to say that someone to report that someone's been accused of a crime to whether the period goes on the outside or the inside of the parenthesis. The good news is, if I haven't scared you off yet, you've already overcome the biggest obstacle. Specifically in reference to the articles you mention, you appear to be tussling with our notability policy, which is our way of deciding what is important enough to have an article here. There's an overarching standard, the general notability guideline, plus a plethora of specialized guidelines for specific topics ranging from battles to actors. Andrew K.C. Nyirenda was considered acceptable because he's the chief justice of Malawi, and our notability guideline for politicians and judges states that almost all people of such rank are notable. By contrast, Saman Arastoo was not considered okay because he doesn't meet any of the criteria listed in our guideline for actors. Most importantly, he doesn't currently appear to have major roles in multiple notable films (and we have special guidelines for films, too). Because notability is an attribute of the subject rather than the article itself, the fact that an article is not notable doesn't mean there's anything wrong with your writing itself; on the other hand, there's usually nothing you can do to prevent an unnotable article from being deleted, because you can't make it notable. You can demonstrate that it is notable by finding multiple reliable, independent sources that cover the subject in some depth, but often, one finds they simply don't exist.
That probably doesn't give you a whole lot to go off of. My only advice is to memorize the GNG, and make sure to reference the special guideline when you're considering a specific article. (There's a master list of notability pages in the box on the right at WP:N, and usually finding something from there is simple). Notability is basically the brick wall of content creation, and I'm unfortunately not sure what else to say on the matter. If you have any further questions about notability or anything else pertaining to content creation, of course feel free to ask. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
For what it's worth, after reviewing the sourcing of Saman Arastoo, I've concluded it is notable and cast in favor of keeping it (you can read my argument on the AfD, but it's essentially that he isn't an actor for the purposes of determining notability because that's not what he's known for). This is one of the more nuanced ones I've run into; we'll have to see what happens (and for the record, you are more than welcome to vote yourself; just remember that arguments decide these discussions, not tallies of votes.) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ecological economics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ecological economics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ecological economics

The article Ecological economics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ecological economics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CHS, with Name (PAT).png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CHS, with Name (PAT).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CHS, with Name.png

A tag has been placed on File:CHS, with Name.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:CHS, with Name (PAT).png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CHS, with Name (PAT).png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvey Specter (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:
The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article, such as List_of_Suits_characters#Main_characters. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, PoliceSheep99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Lord Buckethead.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Supply Chain Coordination Limited

I use the wikipedia template for citations. What do you think is wrong with them?

The tag has been taken off. I apologise. I had many tabs open and I put it on the wrong article. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User:PoliceSheep99/TalkArchive/3"