User:PedEye1

Welcome!

Hello, PedEye1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! alteripse 02:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Your help in pruning the vitamin C nonsense from the SBS page is especially appreciated. alteripse 02:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: force section of Shaken Baby Syndrome

It's been a while since I've read on shaken baby syndrome. But, I do remember reading that Bandak study, and it stuck in my mind as an egregious perversion. You should read those two letters to the editor that I've cited. He just did the math wrong - maybe on purpose. To say the validity of his results have been challenged, implies a debate. I don't think there is much debate. Now for the ad hominem attack: Bandak is a gun for hire. He is a professional witness, I think he wrote the paper to stack his resume for future court dates - I found this with some google snooping back in the day. I think the journal should of printed a retraction, maybe they did and I don't know about it. I would suggest removing the whole section, but I was thinking it best if it stood and stood refuted. Anyways, I'm new to the whole wikipedia community, and I'll leave it your hands. I've got pdfs of those letters if you'd like to take a look. --Lightenoughtotravel (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)