User:Madhero88/Archives2
A-Class discussion
Hi, we're starting the discussion on A-Class here today, thanks for signing up! I hope you can present your views. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 07:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Operationsmilebig.jpeg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Moved from mainspace
Originally was here, I labelled it for CSD
 |
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
|
NVO (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Heey
Thanx for the Cookie :D its my pleasure to help buddy :)
T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey Maen
I finished inviting my part of the WP:MED participants list, and I invited the inactive members as well, why not!
If you need any help in anything else, just whistle :)
T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks (again).
Thank you for the welcome...again! :) Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Atorvastatin peer review
You are very welcome - hope my comments and the peer review continue to be useful. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Image with wikilinks
I can try - could you give an example of one I have made, so I know what you are thinking of? Also, what image do you want to add links to and what are the links? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- OK, you are trying to put rectangles over quadrants of the abdomen? I put wikilinked text labels in instead - does that work? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Tagging
Hi Madhero88. Thanks for your work tagging articles for speedy deletion. However could I ask you attach a reason for the request. For example {{db-a7}} if the article asserts no notability or {{db-attack}} if the article is an attack page? You can find more help at WP:CSD. Pedro : Chat 08:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi. Could you be more careful when tagging speedies? You tagged an article on the morning show for the Philippine's major TV channel (which I reverted), as well as tagging a page on a chemical test as "patent nonsense", when it clearly wasn't (I deleted the article for notability reasons). Thanks, yandman 09:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
""Same here. Please add a reason why. For more information, see WP:CSD. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to pile on here, but also be careful with the "no content" tag for speedy deletion - this article clearly has content. Perhaps you meant A7, for an article about a band that doesn't assert notability? Regards, Somno (talk) 13:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to add yet another example but you're only be able to correct your mistakes if people tell you you're making them. This time the problem is with Northwestern Middle School as speedy deletion under A7 only applies to real people, organisations and web content. Schools are specifically mentioned as something that A7 does not apply to. Can I suggets you read WP:CSD and try to be more careful. Dpmuk (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Relevant bit is here: WP:CSD#A7. A7 applies to, to quote, "An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools)." Dpmuk (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Adoption Offer
Hi there. Thanks for offering to adopt me as a user. I work for a company called TechSkills, and we'd like to create an informative profile regarding our company (abiding by Wikipedia's COI rules, of course). I started an article on my user page, but I want to figure out the best way to get it added to Wikipedia while abiding by all applicable rules. Take a look at it and let me know what you think our next steps should be.
Also, it's been suggested that I should change my username because it might conflict with Wikipedia policies on self-promotion. I'll take care of this as soon as I get in touch with you, to avoid any confusion.
Thanks.
Techskillsedu (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Adoption
Hi. Thanks for your offer, which I would like to accept. However I can't seem to find out where I do this - could you advise me? Thanks 32red (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks very much, and I'll be in touch as and when I need help. 32red (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
You may want to discuss your edits of major medicine templates first. I noticed you editing of Template:WPMED Navigation, and while I don't mind, others may. kilbad (talk) 22:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Would you mind looking at Experientia docet
Would you take a look at that article. I created it and feel it does not meet criteria for deletion. If you agree would you mind removing the tag and commenting on the talk page? kilbad (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Papillomavirus template - response
Glad you like the papillomavirus template I was drafting on my user page. Yes I intend it to link the articles on HPV, Pap smear, Cervical CA, etc. I hadn't made it into a template yet because it still needs a bit of work on organization (especially the part about Colposcopy, biopsy, and treatment). But since you expressed interest in it, I went ahead and created the Template:Human papillomavirus, so that others can work on it too. Thanks. Zodon (talk) 22:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Mind map at "Lung cancer"
Hi, Madhero88. I noticed your mind map at "Lung cancer". However I have some concerns. I would appreciate your comments here. Thanks. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
School Deletions
Thought I'd start a new section as we're moving away from speedy tagging. I think I see what your getting at. Schools con not be 'speedy deleted' however they can be deleted by the 'proposed deletion' and 'articles for deletions' routes. The deletion policy page explains this in all detail. As an aside it's normal (a long standing consensus at AfD) for not-notable schools to be re-directed to a page that lists them or, if none does, is about the area the schools in (see the bottom of the education section here) - I often forget this and prod instead only to have someone correct me. Dpmuk (talk) 13:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Madhero88. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Byrontini, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G11 because of the following concern: Please note that G11 only applies to blatant advertising. It's not for articles with non-neutral wording nor a replacement to delete non-notable subjects that fail A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards SoWhy 14:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the note Maen. K. A. (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I hate to say this
I feel you were very sarcastic and snarky while promoting the deletion of my article on Libero De Rienzo. Parnagerstar (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I would like to add you should research something before you accuse it of it not being notable. Alexandra Crandell is on a popular television show called The City. Despite not being a fan of her or the show she appears on, I thought she merited an entry like the rest of The City cast, for example Whitney Port and Olivia Palermo.
Not only that, she is signed to One Management and Independent Talent Group Ltd.. If you go to those model agency websites, you will notice that a majority of the models have wikipedia entries such as Chandra North, Bar Refaeli, Naomi Campbell, Natalia Vodianova, Oriol Elcacho and Karen Elson, just to name a few.
To defend her notability, she has been profiled in New York magazine. Only the top models in the industry get profiled.
There are currently 80 wikipedia entries for Big Brother contestants who have done nothing noteworthy other than appearing on Big Brother. Yet, you have not requested any of those articles for deletion. There is no reason why you should promote the deletion of the Alexandra Crandell entry based on the aforementioned information. Sid1977 (talk) 04:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi please don't take that personal, I have no reason to tag a page you created, all I see is the page, and you must include these things in the article before telling me that, anyway sorry if you feel that the tag was so fast and you didn't had time to complete the article, and after all the article is since here, since deletions are not made haphazardly, and your welcome to wikipedia Maen. K. A. (talk) 07:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Mind maps
They are interesting maps however one has to enlarge to see properly and they take some time to understand. They are also hard to edit. It will be up to the group at WP:MED. Cheers --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
GorillaThrill
can you please provide a full reason why you deleted that page? thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vtownfball4 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
LOL!
Thanks for the barnstar! My finger is oftern faster than the Twinkle. :)) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, now the RickK means a lot. I am truly honored. I used to work closely with Rick and we used to communicate by e-mail. I miss him terribly and Rick, if you're reading this, this is for you. Many, many thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Techskillsedu Name Change
Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that I've changed my username from "Techskillsedu" to "Wildbasin360" to avoid any indication of self-promotion in my username. I moved over my article from the Techskillsedu profile to the Wildbasin360 profile. Please let me know what edits need to be made to the article to make it ready for posting.
Thanks,
Wildbasin360 (talk) 13:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Edit reversion on 'Food for Fighters'
If you didn't notice, as you keep reverting it, I'm cleaning up the vandalism on Food for Fighters, where someone has added in sexual references that are not present in the film, as well as an insult to US soldiers. Your reverts are reverting the page to its vandalised state!
Kelly Clarkson
Why did you revert my edits to All I Ever Wanted (album) regarding Australian chart positions? Chris (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)toxic two
User talk:91.110.198.212
I think you'll find that you used the wrong template on my talk page (User talk:91.110.198.212). You should also try to correct the problem rather than use an automated reversion. 91.110.198.212 (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am aware of the procedures but don't know that tag to label an article as needing a complete rewrite. It's crap, hence the use of {{crap}}. Instead of reverting the edit it would have been more approriate for you to substitute the correct tag. Thanks, 91.110.198.212 (talk) 15:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Voodoo
I think my edit was constructive because I removed a section that was unneeded and was cluttering up the page with some fans opinion about the song with absolutely no citation or validation of any kind. The writer rambled on and the section could not be revised without being removed. There was nothing of use in the section. The writer was just giving their own take on it and even guessing how the musician thinks with no citation. There are even spelling and grammar errors. I think you should have given your advice to whomever wrote that section in the first place as that looks more like a test edit. The section I tried to remove was vandalism. You have been given the right to rollback pages but you clearly cannot judge the vandalism that was in them in the first place.
Vandalism warning
You have placed a vandalism warning on my talkpage here for my "unconstructive" edit to Chimpanzee here. If you look closely, you will notice that my edit was to remove the word "fuck" which had been inserted after one of titles for no discenible reason. I do not consider this action to be unconstructive.--Tangent747 (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hola!!!!!!!!
Im sorry that u got all those stupid messages on wikipedia. A 14 year old neighbor is really crazy and he had nothing better to do but bother you guys.. I really apologize for this.
Thanks
MJ mary_baby720@yahoo.com.mx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.30.68.213 (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Neuqua Valley High School revert
Hey, you reverted a huge amount of edits I made to the page on Neuqua Valley High School, citing vandalism. Much of what I did was to remove vandalism and irrelevant information, and most of the edits I made had edit descriptions. Further, all of my edits were correct, relevant, and not vandalism, and they took me a good while to do. Can you either put them back, or let me do it? I'd put it back myself right away, were I not worried that you'd revert it again.
Thanks. 199.94.84.61 (talk) 23:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Yngwie article
Hi, The Criticism section which I removed had no real place being there. Blender, which has a reputation for being a generally untrusted source posted an article which defiled huge bands such as Whitesnake and The Doors. The article is generally ignored, in a similar way to Rolling Stones greatest 100 guitarists. The article had no place on the page, and any criticism of his technique and style, should be documented from recognized sources such as Guitarist Magazine, Total Guitar, Classic Rock etc. I think you are wrong in what you did, and by the looks of it, you seem to have annoyed a few more people round here. I think you should maybe take a break from Wikipedia, you seem a little addicted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.155.38 (talk) 02:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Zorro
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zorro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Peabody80 (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Might be an issue in the system, but it is showing you as editing the article with some vulgarities. If not, sorry. We can both keep an eye on the article to try to cut out the vandalism. Peabody80 (talk) 19:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
TechSkills edits
Hello. Regarding the campus locations, there isn't a significant difference between them - I just thought it would be helpful to include a geographic list of all of the campuses. I changed the list into a table as you suggested. Let me know if you have any other recommendations for the article.
Thanks, Wildbasin360 (talk) 20:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
I'm sure you'd do the same for me. William Avery (talk) 08:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
WIKI WAR
The vandalism will not stop. Ih ave delayed the wiki war for weeks, know i have over 300 particpants. We will ruin wikipedia, starting at noon today (i start before) until kingpin 13 is removed from power. He abuses his privilage, deleting proper pages
WIKI WAR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.173.53 (talk) 13:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Editting Rules
This editing on North Shore Middle School is being done by a class at North Shore Middle School. We deleted a page because we had two North Shore pages and not one. And the other information we deleted was because there were some mistakes in it. If you could reply to tell us what we should do that would be great. Knights 7 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC) Knights 7
- I made few changes by moving the stub template and external links to the end where they should be, and I made the other page a redirect to this one, you may need to add some references Maen. K. A. (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Episodes Table
Follow this link and you'll see the table of episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jon_%26_Kate_Plus_8_episodes 70.24.233.37 (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not a vandal
Hi, you left a note saying I'm a vandal on my user page, but your link to my supposed act of vandalism gives me a 404; I suspect it was the false positive report I left on Clubot's page. Could you elaborate on how that was vandalism as Cluebot's reporting mechanism is down and a note at the top of that page tells me to leave false positive reports there —Preceding unsigned comment added by VJ (talk • contribs) 13:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am so sorry thats probably my mistake, please accept this apology and enjoy editing :-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, we all make mistakes, I know I've made my own fair share before. Having the bot flag me as a false positive just before you reverted my FP report probably annoyed more than it should have done. I hope I didn't come across over the top in any of my replies VJ (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Re:March2009
Thanks for the huggle revert[1] and message on my talk page. However, I was just trying to take the userpage out of a category — so it wasn't bad faith. You might want to read edit summaries and possibly provide those when you revert good faith edits in the future. Regards, Capricorn24 (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am so sorry thats probably my mistake, please accept this apology and enjoy editing :-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- No worries..I've too made many such mistakes when I used to patrol with huggle. Capricorn24 (talk) 16:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Your question
It can't be stopped, but calling someone a "freak" falls foul of WP:No personal attacks. William Avery (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Apology
86.160.144.48 (talk) 20:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC) I have a brother who keeps writing wrong messages in different pages. I would like to appoligise for his mistakes. Thank you.
Re: NPWatcher request
Done –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Lyn Philp
Hi, how can I get the photo of Lyn Philp restored File:Lyn Philp pb.jpg in the Infobox Boxer
Regards Dave Philp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Escapement (talk • contribs) 03:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
what the hell are you talking about????
You just wrote on my talk page claiming that i am attacking other users. In what way did i attack anyone?!?! I did not threaten anyones live, or sware at a single person, your crazy. 207.246.181.26 (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- calling an admin crazy perhaps.... (which is not a good idea espesialy if its J.delanoy) rdunnPLIB 15:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
response to your thank you
rdunnPLIB 15:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Colds7ream (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
For the revert. Acroterion (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Ted Allen
my edits are not vandalism wikepedia claims to be an online encylopedia yet saying a person who is gaay referring to him as gaay, sorry but if I spell it right it will get censored, constitutes vandalism? On his page it even states he lives with his partner! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.69.250 (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Avon Valley School
ok im sorry forgive me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.64.234 (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I replied
I replied here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#New_Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine_Design. I missed your question because it was so far up the page.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 16:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I am not sure about having the WikiProject Medicine all in capitals on the front page. I think that the main problem is getting it to display on small screen computers. Once that problem is resolved I think that you can then reask the wikiproject medicine members again what they think of it. Good luck with your exams.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 18:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Mp
How is Mark Purayah II now.--AKM73 (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
93.97.167.197
93.97.167.197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Fun, fun, fun, ;p SpitfireTally-ho! 19:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Chuckle, chuckle, Great work on the Recent change patrol by the way, cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 20:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC) SpitfireTally-ho! 20:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences
Hello, I am new to creating articles on Wikipedia. You tagged/flagged or noted (I dont even know the right term!) some warnings on a page (Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences) I created a couple of days ago. I appreciate your work on that. However, I am not sure how I can get those tags off of the article. I understand that I need to improve the article which I am doing. Is there a specific process that I get the article through for the flags to be off of it? Thank you for your time. Diwakarvk (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Diwakarvk
Lyn Philp
Thanks for your help, most appreciated Escapement (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- your most welcome Maen. K. A. (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
User:Madhero88/IMAGE
Would you mind moving User:Madhero88/IMAGE into wiki space, since articles currently link to it? --Arcadian (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FrehleySpace Ace 14:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
vascular surgery review website
Hello, I've created a review page on the subject of vascular surgery. it is found at www.vascularsurgeryreview.com the site if free and contains 4 files with comprehensive notes on the subject of vascular surgery. There are no such resourses available on the web. As far as i know this is the first. Let me know if you think this is useful.
anton sharapov, md antonsharapov@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.163.117 (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
TechSkills References
I just added a reference section to the TechSkills site, at your suggestion. Let me know if I need to change the formatting, or add more sources.
Wildbasin360 (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Zygote
Hi, you accidentally reverted my revert back to the the vandalized version. I am sure this was a mistake, I just wanted to give you a heads up.WackoJackO 08:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Reverting my edits?
Hi,
Can you please give me a valid reason why you are reverting my edits?
Thanks --195.158.84.236 (talk) 09:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
my info
hiv and AIDs in Africa.why was it not good i have been studing it and my info is correct!!!!!!!!:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.165.161.147 (talk) 09:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Youtube Poop CDI Page
Can you tell me why the Youtube Poop comment is not allowed.
It's the truth of what happens in 2009 to these games and is what they're well known for today.
Plus I also want to know how to report a member if it's possible to tell me. User "Treelo" reported my IP for vandalism just because of the comment regarding Youtube Poop. I think it's absolute BS to say it in it's kindest that I could be banned for just adding this. Some people just seem to take these privileges of a account to their head it seems.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.133.197.136 (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Warning on 121.221.96.219
[2]. Don't worry about warning for that, it's just my bot being silly and editing logged-out. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)