User:Junwei Sheng/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

• Name of article: Artificial intelligence in video games
• For my perspective, game is an indispensable part of modern life. I think that games and intelligence are inseparable, because people need to observe, think, learn, practice, and use the knowledge accumulated in the past to win rewards. The emergence of AI games means that players need to further develop their brains, have more knowledge and creative ideas.

Lead

Guiding questions

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Yes.

• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

No. This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents.

• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No.

• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It is concise, but can be improved.

Content

Guiding questions

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic?

Yes.

• Is the content up-to-date?

No.

• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No. But it has more areas, which has not mentioned in the lead section.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions

• Is the article neutral?

Yes.

• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No.

• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No.

• Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No.

Sources and References

Guiding questions

• Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Not all the facts has backed up by a reliable secondary source.

• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes.

• Are the sources current?

No. Some are outdated.

• Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes.

Organization

Guiding questions

• Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes, but some sections have no reason to appear.

• Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?

Yes, a few.

• Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

No.

Images and Media

Guiding questions

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Just one image.

• Are images well-captioned?

Yes.

• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

Yes.

• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Yes.

Checking the talk page

Guiding questions

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

Ask questions about different kinds of AI.

• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

AI in video games has been listed as a level-5 vital articale. It is a part of WikiProject Video Games.

• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

The way that Wikipedia discusses this topic has more external link to study by people, not only the content for this article.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions

• What is the article's overall status?

It needs more content and references.

• What are the article's strengths?

It talks basic AI program and history for video games with concise examples.

• How can the article be improved?

It needs more images. Some sections need more detailed information and resources.

• How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

It is underdeveloped.

Optional activity

• Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

• Link to feedback: Talk:Artificial intelligence in video games