I suspect that User:Việt Nam Dân Chủ Tiến Bộ Đảng could be an alternate account of User:馮光遠想跟能登麻美子交合 -- they both edit in similar areas and both proclaim a 'love' for various human rights activists. On closer examination of the article history there appears to be a network of sock-puppetry surrounding Chinese human rights issues. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nipponese Dog Calvero/Archive. I have to go off-line now and don't have time to file an SPI, but I thought I'd mention it for a second opinion? Pol430talk to me 12:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
They seem to be making some of the same kinds of edits, but I'm not sure. I'll try to keep an eye on this. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
hi
This is where i stay--Neogeolegend (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
In the past you have been involved in a block/unblock procedure either on the sockmaster account of LouisPhilippeCharles or an account of one of the sockpuppets. Please see WP:ANI#LouisPhilippeCharles -- PBS (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
I got the same message, but can't remember or find how I was involved. On a completely unrelated note, I got one of the scholarships to wikimania, coming all the way from Alaska. From what I recall, you could drive there in a day... c'mon, when is it ever going to be so close to buckeye sate again? Next year is in Hong Kong... Beeblebrox (talk) 06:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey, FisherQueen, may I suggest that you delete the other related pages per A10, so we don't have duplicate deletion conversations going on? Or you could just SNOW delete it; trust me, the article is utter nonsense. But it's up to you, of course. Thanks! Writ Keeper⚇♔ 16:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Those articles really are nonsense, aren't they? I probably could have speedied them as such, but now I'm reluctant to take the slightly tacky action of closing an AfD I myself opened. I don't suppose we have a physics-nonsense emergency, so I'm going to let someone else close it, even though it isn't especially controversial. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't say it's G1-able nonsense; it's not quite word-salad. Nonsense from a scientific perspective, but not quite from a semantic perspective. YMMV on that, though; there are some sentences in there that I really just can't make heads or tails of. In any event, there's no real rush; I don't think anyone would be able to take this seriously. It'll get there eventually. :) Writ Keeper⚇♔ 19:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Lindsey Cairns articles
In addition to the already notified Rickster8649, Paramore lindsey (a new account with no other contribs) has just created an article on Cairns (although it's not an attack page). Possible sock? Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 17:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I've blocked that account as a sockpuppet, though of course it could just as easily be multiple bored teenagers working together. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. Just so you know, IP 176.250.6.131 also edited the Cairns article which you just speedied as A7, adding defamatory content. It's probably another sock / cohort. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 17:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to assume that autoblock will prevent that ip from making more edits now that the account is blocked... but I'll keep it on my watchlist and directly block it if it's a different ip. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
