User:Eubulides/sandbox/autism

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Autism assessment

Assessment criteria

Assessment of autism spectrum-related articles:

  • Importance
    • Top = Core article or primary definition; central autism concept/person or necessary for basic coverage of the topic (e.g.; autism spectrum disorder, Hans Asperger)
    • High = Core daughter article (per WP:MEDMOS sections) or significant related definition/person, hard to write the article comprehensively and NPOV without this article, enjoys widespread notability and consensus (e.g.; Causes of autism, Uta Frith)
    • Mid = Daughter article or broad/basic definition, important for comprehensive coverage of the top issues, but not an integral definition or WP:MEDMOS component (e.g.; EQ SQ theory, Simon Baron-Cohen)
    • Low = Non-core, the topic could be covered without this article
  • Quality
    • Has attained FA
    • A-class or could attain with a bit of work
    • GA-class or could attain GA with a bit of work
    • B-equivalent, mostly cited and accurate, but has some issues, could be citations, OR, POV, or incomprehensive. Not too much work needed to bring to decent standard, but may still be a stub or start.
    • Some cleanup/work needed, below B-class, has some issues like lack of citations, OR, POV, incomprehensive. Sustained attention needed to bring to standard.
    • More work needed, multiple issues such as uncited, essay, POV, dubious accuracy or questionable notability. Lots of attention needed.

Assessment table

Autism
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low
Quality
FA A B C D
almost
ready for A
E F G H
almost
ready for GA
I J K L
B-equiv. M N O P
Some

cleanup
needed

Q R S T
More work

needed:
Uncited,
essay,
notability,
or POV

U V W X

Templates, categories, and portals