User:EmDom521/Fred Mhalu/Meticulousonion Peer Review
Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
- EmDom521
- Link to draft you're reviewing:
Lead
Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
- Yes (new page)
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Yes
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Yes, the information on his current work
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- Nice and concise
Lead evaluation
I think your lead is in a very good place, just needs a bit of copy editing and it's good.
Content
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- Yes
- Is the content added up-to-date?
- Yes, to the best of my knowledge
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- No
Content evaluation
You have done great work to locate and compile information on the subject. Great work!
Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral?
- Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- No
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No
Tone and balance evaluation
The facts presented in the article are not trying to persuade a reader toward one viewpoint or another. It is nicely balanced and does a great job presenting information on the subject.
Sources and References
Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- From what I was able to see briefly online, yes
- Are the sources current?
- Yes
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- Yes
Sources and references evaluation
Sources look good and the links within the article are great!
Organization
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Yes.
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Mostly. there were a few places where sentences could be simplified a little to make them clearer.
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes, if possible it may help to have subheadings within the career section.
Organization evaluation
Before moving this over to Wiki, it would be worth giving it a read through from start to finish as if you didn't know anything about the subject.
Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?Are images well-captioned?Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
If you could find some images of the university or something like that it could be a bit more appealing to a reader.
For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- Yes
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- From a historical perspective, it is great.
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Infobox may be helpful to gather biographical information in a quick glance.(there's a template under the insert menu)
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
- Yes, many times.
New Article Evaluation
It is very solid first entry for an article.
Overall impressions
Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- How can the content added be improved?
Overall evaluation
You did great work finding resources to support this biography. The writing is excellent and just needs some formatting upgrades and a proof for clarity to be ready to publish.