User:Donald Albury/First, do no harm
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
In considering the current debate over the inclusion of biographical articles about living persons who are known exclusively or primarily over one unfortunate incident, I thought the dictum from the Hippocratic Oath, "First, do no harm", might be relevant. Ah, but it turns out that well-known phrase is not found in the Hippocratic Oath after all (see Primum non nocere. But that article led me to a discussion of the moral issues involved, at Jonathan Baron. "Do no harm".
Baron starts with a discussion of constraint-based ethical systems compared to utilitarianism. When I read John Stuart Mills more than 45 yeats ago, I was quite impressed with his arguments. But all these years later I realize that I never have fully believed in 'utilitarianism'. I cannot accept that the well-being of a person is ever worth sacrificing to the 'common good'.
In my younger days, when I toyed with thoughts of revolution, I realized that I could not support or participate in any 'revolution' that would harm innocent, or even not-so-innocent, people. Even the instruments of oppression do not deserve to be harmed merely because they are instruments of the oppressors. If I am unwilling to unnecessarily harm the wicked, how can I harm the innocent?