User:DJames5/Motivated-Hygiene Theory
Motivation–Hygiene Theory
Frederick Herzberg also came up with the concept of job enrichment, which expands jobs to give employees a greater role in planning, performing, and evaluating their work, thus providing the chance to satisfy their motivators needs. some suggested ways would be to remove some management control, provide regular and continously feedback. Proper job enrichment, therefore, involves more than simply giving the workers extra tasks to perform. It means expanding the level of knowledge and skills needed to perform the job. [1]
Reference
- ^ Schultz, Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen (2010). Psychology and work today : an introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (10th ed. ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. p. 71. ISBN 978-0205683581.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
DJames5 (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Pre-edit Peer review Feedback
Name of student reviewer: F.Moshammad
Date of review:04/20/13
Name of Editor: DJames5
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5/Motivated-Hygiene_Theory
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/20/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 04/20/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Exceeds the requirement
Image (needed/appropriate): Not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A
Wiki formatting: Good formatting
Grammar & composition: Proper construction of edit
Other comments: Good job! You can use more formatting details such as bullet lists or numbered lists for additional credit, if you want.
F.Moshammad (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan
Date of review:04/24/13
Name of Editor: DJames5
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DJames5
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/17/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 04/17/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): 3+ Sentences
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-Yes
Wiki formatting: Good formatting
Grammar & composition: Composed well and proper grammar
Other comments: Simple
--Christina geo (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)