User:Andrewa/True false and Wikipedic
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This user page is under construction. Do not blame the user for any edits that look like vandalism. It isn't perfect. Yet. |  |
There's a certain amount of confusion about the exact role of research in writing Wikipedia. I've been confused myself and have probably confused others from time to time. Here's how I see it currently!
True
and the lonely voice of youth asks, "What is truth?" - Johny Cash
False
A false statement can't be verifiable, because it can't be verified. Obviously.
And this gives us a useful shortcut to rejecting some material. It's such an obvious shortcut that we don't often see it as one!
Wikipedic
Statements such as John Brown said "all Cretans are liars" are encyclopedic iff:
- They are true.
- They are verifiable.
- They meet some other rather subjective criteria which are sometimes called notability and sometimes not.