Template talk:Number sign

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject iconTypography Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNumbers
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Requested move 14 August 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. More pointless template moves... Jenks24 (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Template:PoundTemplate:Number sign – More generic/neutral and the Unicode name used (and linked) in the documentation. Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support pound could also be a reference to mass of currency. I think number sign will be clearer to more people than pound.--67.68.22.129 (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support it's not the sign for the British currency, nor "lb" symbol for weight, so is highly ambiguous. Optionally {{hashmark}} or {{octothorp}}/{{octothorpe}} are also reasonable and even less ambiguous that "number sign" (which could mean №) -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:
  • Comment any idea why we have {{Hash-tag}} ? # ; couldn't this be a <big><bold> version of this template instead? -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Output in texts copied verbatim from French Wikipedia

French Wikipedia uses template {{Numéro|x}} to output "nº x" (where "x" is normally a number): fr:Modèle:Numéro. If an author copies text (title of a reference, etc.) verbatim from French Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, eg. when translating an article, and fails to notice the presence of that template or is not aware of the different output, the output changes to "#" and the number is lost. Is there anything that should and can be done about it, except manually replacing the French-sourced template with "nº"? 84.69.182.103 (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came across this while posting the notice below. Numéro should redirect instead to {{Numero}}, if there are no objections. If you look at transcluding pages using {{Numéro}} they appear to all be French translations. The Manual of Style prefers "No." to "#" or "№". Rjjiii (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Discussion regarding image use

There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#Images in templates regarding how to handle templates that were created to insert images of typographic characters. These characters are now available via Unicode. Please comment there if interested, Rjjiii (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]