Template talk:Mag-stub
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whitespace
- current image
 | This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. See tips for writing articles about magazines. Further suggestions might be found on the article's talk page. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. See tips for writing articles about magazines. Further suggestions might be found on the article's talk page. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. See tips for writing articles about magazines. Further suggestions might be found on the article's talk page. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- image:Magazine.svg at 30px
 | This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This magazine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Title
Given that 'mag' means a number of things (flashlights, tires, magnification), perhaps this should be renamed to Magazine-stub. I've added the template redirect for that to here, but I'd some help and other opinions. --Kickstart70 20:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Editrequest
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please revert the 11 April 2013 edit, to the image used in March. The current image is too big, and leave a tonne of whitespace. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Not done: The current image meets the image size guidelines in WP:STUB, and in my opinion is a more appropriate image for the subject area. If you would like to see it changed back, my suggestion would be to discuss it directly with the editor who made the change to the template back in April. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
