This template is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This template was considered for deletion on 14 February 2008. The result of the discussion was "keep but simplify".
This template was considered for deletion on 17 April 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep but revise to remove excessive detail".
comments
This coat of arms should be of the Steward/Stewarts. Personals coat of arms belongs to dynasties--national coats of arms go to kingdoms. See the Duke of Rothesay's arms; minus galleys and escutcheon. All surname bearers of Stewart have historically used such arms, including Matthew Stewart, 4th Earl of Lennox. IP Address 22:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added Henry, Prince of Wales. I hope I have not misunderstood how the template works, but I couldn't see any reason for him to be missing. Deb 12:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
TfD
I've nominated this template for deletion, as it appears to me ill thought out in the extreme. Were it a horizontal footer table, or a collapsible vertical table, it /might/ just pass - though why we would want to see a list of all of the children of all Stuart kings is beyond me. As it is, I find it nothing more than a conceit. Just because a thing can be done does not mean it should be done. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 February 14. --Tagishsimon(talk) 01:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
