Template talk:Did you know/Sitti Nurbaya
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sitti Nurbaya
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sharktopus talk
- ... that the author of Sitti Nurbaya never returned to his hometown after publishing it?
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 16:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that good is beautiful in Sitti Nurbaya?
- ALT2: ... that, despite its "clichéed descriptions", Sitti Nurbaya is considered one of the most important works of Indonesian literature?
- ALT3: ... that Sitti Nurbaya may have been written in response to the author being told to marry another woman while already married?
- ALT4: ... that in certain circles Sitti Nurbaya may be read more often in synopsis than as a whole?
- ALT5: ... that Sitti Nurbaya may be "the first true Indonesian novel"?
- Reviewed: Herb Kawainui Kane (diff)
- Generally well-written, although there are a number of minor issues to be addressed. The article has been tagged accordingly. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have addressed both tags; clarified one and got rid of the controversy statement (the source didn't go into detail, and I couldn't find anything online). Anything else, preferences for the hook perhaps? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
| Format | Citation | Neutrality | Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius |
- I think the original hook is fine, it being interesting yet cryptic enough. I would leave the choice of ALT hooks to others; my only comment on the alts is my feeling that ALT4 is the weakest by a large margin. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Any reason for the x in neutrality? Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Inadvertance. I copied the table and must have not noticed the cross. Apologies. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 16:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
| Length | Newness | Adequate citations |
Formatted citations |
Reliable sources |
Neutrality | Plagiarism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius | ✔ Ohconfucius |