Template:Editor review
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. See WT:ER for further information. |
 | This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Example. |
 | This template may have no transclusions, because it is substituted by a tool or script, it is used as part of a short-term or less active Wikipedia process, or for some other reason. |
- Tag your userpage with
{{Editor review}}after setting up an editor review for yourself. This will automatically add you to Category:Wikipedians on editor review. - If you have previously submitted a review request, you will need to specify the location of the new review; for example,
{{Editor review|Username 2}}if it's your second review request. You can also use {{!}} to change the link. - If it has been a while and you are still not reviewed, you may add the following parameter:
{{Editor review|class=review needed}}. This will expand the box with the message "This user is still awaiting reviews. Any comment would be greatly appreciated!" It will also add you to Category:Wikipedians on editor review/Backlog. - If you've already had a review but wouldn't mind more, add the following parameter:
{{Editor review|class=review had}}. This will expand it to add "This user already had at least one review, but wouldn't mind several more reviews.". - If you do not wish to be categorized into Category:Wikipedians on editor review, just added the following parameter:
{{Editor review|nocat=yes}}. - This template uses the {{GENDER}} magic word.
See also
- {{RfX-notice}} – a similar template for users with active requests for adminship, bureaucratship, bot approval, and checkusership.