Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Inclusion criteria For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than two qualifying participants for RSN discussions where the source's name is in the section heading, and no fewer than three qualifying participants for all other discussions. Qualifying participants are editors who make at least one comment on the source's reliability. |
| This editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Edit summary Please include a descriptive edit summary with your changes. This makes it easier for other editors to audit the page history. |
| This editnotice (for Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
 | Instructions Please refer to the instructions (WP:RSPI) for help editing the list. Feel free to ask for help on the talk page if you get stuck. |